这两个设备使用不同的控制方法
- 高微步分辨率
- 光滑
- 没有分流电阻器
- 对参数和共振的变化更敏感(这些变化中的一些由ST算法补偿)
- 不适合全步操作
- 控制的稳健性(闭环)
- 降低微步分辨率
- 需要分流电阻
使用两种控制方法可以获得的输出扭矩几乎相同,但由于闭环操作,L6482可以在高速时提升。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
The two devices use different control methods
- High microstepping resolution
- Smoothness
- No shunt resistor
- More sensitive to the variation of the parameters and resonances (some of these variations are compensated by the ST algorithm)
- Not suitable for full-step operation
- Robustness of the control (closed loop)
- Lower microstepping resolution
- Require the shunt resistor
The output torque you can obtain with the two control methods is almost the same, but the L6482 could have a boost at high speed thanks to the closed loop operation.
这两个设备使用不同的控制方法
- 高微步分辨率
- 光滑
- 没有分流电阻器
- 对参数和共振的变化更敏感(这些变化中的一些由ST算法补偿)
- 不适合全步操作
- 控制的稳健性(闭环)
- 降低微步分辨率
- 需要分流电阻
使用两种控制方法可以获得的输出扭矩几乎相同,但由于闭环操作,L6482可以在高速时提升。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
The two devices use different control methods
- High microstepping resolution
- Smoothness
- No shunt resistor
- More sensitive to the variation of the parameters and resonances (some of these variations are compensated by the ST algorithm)
- Not suitable for full-step operation
- Robustness of the control (closed loop)
- Lower microstepping resolution
- Require the shunt resistor
The output torque you can obtain with the two control methods is almost the same, but the L6482 could have a boost at high speed thanks to the closed loop operation.
举报