有没有计划将PSoC Creator与PSoC设计师合并？

这听起来是个不错的主意，但是芯片不是太不同了吗？
鲍勃



     以下为原文
  That sounds like a pretty good idea, but aren't the chips too different?
     
    Bob

我们过去使用PSoC1，但是现在使用PSoC3。因为不需要冰块，也不需要为不同的包取脚。我猜想越来越多的人会切换到PSoC3和PSoC5，虽然芯片更贵，但是在PCB和硬件的开发过程中节省了时间，所以更多的人转向了创建者。



     以下为原文
  We used to use PSOC1 but perfer to use PSOC3 now. as there is no need to get the ICE and no need to get the foot for different packages. My guess is more and more people would switch to PSOC3 and PSOC5 although the chip is more expensive, but save time during development of PCB and hardware, So more people woud switch to Creator.

设计师提供更多的控制，创建者提供更多的易用性
汇编编程仍然提供了构建最小代码的选项，但是它花费了更长的时间和更容易出错的代价。
我的偏好是创造者，毫无疑问，但是因为PSoC 1设备比PSoC3或PSoC 5要简单得多，所以有一种情况需要更多的控制设计环境。
如果赛普拉斯决定将PSoC 1设备的定价与Creator支持的新版本相匹配，这将说服更多的用户跳过设计师渔船，登上Creator Cruise Ship。
你喜欢创造者吗？ME2



     以下为原文
  Designer offers more control, Creator offers more ease of use
    Assembly programming is still offers the option to build the smallest code but it comes at an incredible price of taking much longer and being more error-prone.
    My preference is Creator, no doubt but because PSoC 1 devices are much simpler than PSOC 3 or PSoC 5, there is a case to make for a more control design environment.
    If Cypress decides to match the pricing of PSoC 1 devices with new versions supported by Creator, that's what will convince more users to jump the Designer fisherman boat and get aboard the Creator Cruise Ship
    You prefer Creator? Me2