＆gt;＆gt;＆gt;我想知道ST计划制作VL53L0x的另一个增强版本。
总有另一部分。但大多数人想要更长的距离，所以这是一个优先事项。
＆gt;＆gt;＆gt; VL53L0x的I2C速度和输出速率很慢。
您可以尝试以1MHz运行它。对线路调节有很多限制，但在某些情况下它可以工作。请注意，DataSheet表示400KHz，但有些人会超频。
＆gt;＆gt;＆gt;如果制作了spi接口设备，我希望它能支持菊花链。
感谢您的评论。不幸的是，没有计划改变目前的芯片
＆gt;＆gt;＆gt;目前多传感器接口非常复杂。
硬件简单性与软件之间的权衡是一个棘手的问题。一个人将传感器逐个复位，并发送'地址变更'命令。之后，所有传感器将具有不同的地址。
＆gt;＆gt;＆gt;我希望API库更简单明了。
实际上，软件正在走另一条路。为了获得更多距离，需要更多的软件复杂性。但如果您真的需要更小的API，请查看Polulu Time-of-Flight网页。 ST不支持那里的代码，但有些人使用它。
＆gt;＆gt;＆gt;另外，需要直角安装的传感器。
绝大多数飞行时间传感器适用于手机市场。柔性电缆是一种选择。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
>>>I wonder that ST has plan to make another enhanced version of VL53L0x.
There is always another part. But most people want a longer distance, so that is a priority.
>>>VL53L0x's I2C speed and output rate is slow.
You can try running it a 1MHz. Many restrictions on line conditioning, but in some cases it works. Note that the DataSheet says 400KHz, but some people over-clock that.
>>>If a spi interfaced device is made, I hope that it would support the daisy chain.
Thanks for the comment. No plan to change the current chip unfortunately
>>>Currently multiple sensor interface is very complex.
The trade-off of hardware simplicity vs software is a tricky one. One brings the sensors out of reset one-by-one, and sends an 'address change' command. After that all the sensors will have different addresses.
>>>And I hope that the API library is more simple and light.
Actually the software is going the other way. To get more distance, more software complexity is required. But if you really need a smaller API, have a look at the Polulu Time-of-Flight web page. ST does not support the code there, but some folks use it.
>>>Additionally, a right angle mounted sensor is needed.
The vast majority of the Time-of-Flight sensors are for the cell phone market. A flex cable is one option.
＆gt;＆gt;＆gt;我想知道ST计划制作VL53L0x的另一个增强版本。
总有另一部分。但大多数人想要更长的距离，所以这是一个优先事项。
＆gt;＆gt;＆gt; VL53L0x的I2C速度和输出速率很慢。
您可以尝试以1MHz运行它。对线路调节有很多限制，但在某些情况下它可以工作。请注意，DataSheet表示400KHz，但有些人会超频。
＆gt;＆gt;＆gt;如果制作了spi接口设备，我希望它能支持菊花链。
感谢您的评论。不幸的是，没有计划改变目前的芯片
＆gt;＆gt;＆gt;目前多传感器接口非常复杂。
硬件简单性与软件之间的权衡是一个棘手的问题。一个人将传感器逐个复位，并发送'地址变更'命令。之后，所有传感器将具有不同的地址。
＆gt;＆gt;＆gt;我希望API库更简单明了。
实际上，软件正在走另一条路。为了获得更多距离，需要更多的软件复杂性。但如果您真的需要更小的API，请查看Polulu Time-of-Flight网页。 ST不支持那里的代码，但有些人使用它。
＆gt;＆gt;＆gt;另外，需要直角安装的传感器。
绝大多数飞行时间传感器适用于手机市场。柔性电缆是一种选择。
以上来自于谷歌翻译
以下为原文
>>>I wonder that ST has plan to make another enhanced version of VL53L0x.
There is always another part. But most people want a longer distance, so that is a priority.
>>>VL53L0x's I2C speed and output rate is slow.
You can try running it a 1MHz. Many restrictions on line conditioning, but in some cases it works. Note that the DataSheet says 400KHz, but some people over-clock that.
>>>If a spi interfaced device is made, I hope that it would support the daisy chain.
Thanks for the comment. No plan to change the current chip unfortunately
>>>Currently multiple sensor interface is very complex.
The trade-off of hardware simplicity vs software is a tricky one. One brings the sensors out of reset one-by-one, and sends an 'address change' command. After that all the sensors will have different addresses.
>>>And I hope that the API library is more simple and light.
Actually the software is going the other way. To get more distance, more software complexity is required. But if you really need a smaller API, have a look at the Polulu Time-of-Flight web page. ST does not support the code there, but some folks use it.
>>>Additionally, a right angle mounted sensor is needed.
The vast majority of the Time-of-Flight sensors are for the cell phone market. A flex cable is one option.
举报
